tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1334761054277672365.post2323761005088300387..comments2024-03-22T03:19:38.110-04:00Comments on Forever In Hell: Given Enough RopePersonalFailurehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03034292023591747601noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1334761054277672365.post-86640398879888235632009-04-16T01:11:00.000-04:002009-04-16T01:11:00.000-04:00That's one of the dumber things I've read today, h...That's one of the dumber things I've read today, hiding in plain sight amidst correct grammar and properly punctuated sentences. Clever, but I see his game.<br /><br />"This gets to the core of what marriage is, a both sexed <I>[ok I might have been a bit premature with the allegations of correct grammar]</I> arrangement with the presumption of paternity. Same sex marriage is non existent because it is single sex and there is no presumption of paternity."<br /><br />Of course there's no presumption of paternity. If they're gay, they couldn't exactly have biologically had the child together, could they? This seems like a clear case of wrapping up your conclusion in your premise, swallowing it and feigning surprise when you crap out your answer. Or 'question begging' if you don't like my crude analogy.<br /><br />In any case, it's still a derivative of that lame ass argument 'we can't redefine marriage'. Yes we can. And we fucking will.FrodoSaveshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15224011199139875343noreply@blogger.com