tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1334761054277672365.post4453998683759454227..comments2024-03-22T03:19:38.110-04:00Comments on Forever In Hell: Redefining OptimumPersonalFailurehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03034292023591747601noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1334761054277672365.post-58880663894643841632009-03-05T08:42:00.000-05:002009-03-05T08:42:00.000-05:00Oh, yes, how could I forget "less" and "fewer"? I ...Oh, yes, how could I forget "less" and "fewer"? I just corrected that in a legal doc, too.<BR/><BR/>Did you read the rush post? If so, you've got stupid and crazy all over you.PersonalFailurehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03034292023591747601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1334761054277672365.post-81686183855800664112009-03-05T03:51:00.000-05:002009-03-05T03:51:00.000-05:00"even if the man is a pedophile and the woman is a..."even if the man is a pedophile and the woman is a junkie."<BR/><BR/>Hey that was my childhood!<BR/><BR/>"Now that I've corrected the basic English, let's review emissary's argument. Basically, if the government pays for IVF for homosexuals, less heterosexuals will be able to have babies, and heterosexual couples are automatically better parents."<BR/><BR/>That should be "fewer heterosexuals" use "less" for things that are difficult to count: sand, water, stars, love. Heterosexuals can be difficult to count, unlike gays who like to stand up and be counted.<BR/><BR/>Now that the shallow, frivolity has been dealt with, yes, great post. Emissary is an arse. Now you have made me read his/her blog and I've got stupid all over me.Stewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13584058723818113125noreply@blogger.com