There's a Reason You're Not Getting Laid

I would hope by now you have heard about the study that showed that children of two lesbian parents do better* than even the children of two hetero parents. There's been a lot said about the study on both sides, but what I'm interested in is complete misogynistic asshat's people's reactions to this study. They are both enraging and amusing and not entirely unexpected.

Having two moms has to help with the nurturing

OTOH, having two moms might make you way more neurotic. I call that even.

Da wimminz iz teh crazee! Ah yes, only women are capable of nurturing a child, but watch out! women are also inherently crazy, and will pass that crazy onto their children unless there is a strong (cold) male presence to prevent it!

it's hard to see how being raised by two people neither or whom likes males

could do much for the confidence of male children (although many, if not most, male children of heterosexual couples might be in more or less the same position).

Lezzeez hate teh menz! Look, that's just ridiculous. There are any number of people I like and don't want to fuck, including my niece, my niceboss and my dog. You can't conflate sexual desire with fond feelings, other wise I'm going to assume that you really want to lay one on your grandma.

Lesbians, as a rule, don't "not like" males. They just don't like f@cking them. Not the same!

Thank you. and the reply:

Actually it is, if you are male, or it might as well be.

well, if you view women as nothing more than walking vaginas, cruelly not fulfilling your constant desire to stick your dick somewhere, sure, I bet there are lots of lesbians in your world. like 90% of the female population. here's a clue, buddy: even if I all want is a quick fuck, I don't want it from someone who hates women. lesbians are not your problem.

to even ask this question

is intensely cruel, anti-father and anti-male.

it is like asking: Do we NEED mothers? Guess WHAT! Kids are better off without MOMS!

but what do you care about being decent to men? you're a feminist.

To even ask what happens to real people existing in the real world is intensely cruel? well then, i suppose even thinking of doing studies on healthy people is intensely cruel to the disabled. asshat.

since, to a woman, everything about a man affects her desire for a man

by DEFINITION a lesbian hates men.

no, by definition, everything about a woman affects a lesbian's desires for other women. duh. i guess it sucks to have your oh-so-important penis rendered irrelevant.

if what this is supposed to imply is true

men are actively bad for a child.
Down with fathers!

yeesh. calm down, asshat, we're not bringing out the firing squads yet.

it is reports like this

that make me believe I need to side with the right and to fight the left.

any political persuasion that wants to eradicate one half of the human race is by definition evil.

dude, i'm a lefty and i like to fuck men. oh, yes, i do. *pauses for x-rated reverie* look, i'm sorry reality has a liberal bias, but "lesbians do a good job raising children" is not the same as "death to the penised ones!"

you want to diminish the vital role of men in childrens' lives. I do not know how I can make this clearer.

this sort of anti-male propaganda can no longer stand, not if you expect to hold any morally superior position. Children need biologically MALE fathers in their lives. Otherwise this is tantamount to CHILD ABUSE.

Do not tell me otherwise. To try to legitimize perversions such as this only makes the situation more untenable.

I particularly feel bad about the male children and how brainwashed they will be with so many witches around them. I speak from firsthand experience having grown up in a similar situation and being emotionally scarred for life as a result.

I see the same with some kids today and I wince when I see it.

therapy: you needs it

As a man with a functioning penis and potent sperm

I can honestly say that I don't feel threatened by the study indicating that the children of lesbian mothers are more well behaved than the children of straight couples.

I know there are a lot of women who want my penis and my sperm.

And I know in the future women will want my son's penis and sperm, assuming they are as good as his dad's.

What I do find threatening is the actions of conservatives to try to limit the freedoms and rights of homosexuals.

If lesbians want to raise children, then why should we do anything other than help them out?

I want this man to have his user name tattooed onto his forehead so i can run the other way if i see him.

men may not be eliminated in a physical sense

but the question is, if women can have kids and raise them without men, are they willing to deal with men who aren't either so totally compliant or so abnormally attractive that most men will be, socially, in effect, non existent.

again, the lesbians aren't your problem. if every woman who meets you tries to stab you with a fork, the problem is you.

How does the overwhelming percentage of people in prison that come from families with no father figure in the home affect this obviously biased theory?

On the small scale study in my family my two kids (boy and girl twins by the way) are far and away more mentally healthy than my lesbian sisters daughter. So I say in my experience straight couples have a two to one advantage.

correlation =/= causation fail. a) two families does not a trend make. b) a single parent home is not the same as a two parent home, no matter who the parents are. c) "i hate gays and i think my gay sister's kid is fucked up" is not actually a scientific study.

*It's been suggested that (a) these were planned pregnancies, (b) there were no unplanned siblings, and (c) any lesbian getting artificially inseminated 25 years ago would have been educated, well off and quite strong, all of which, when combined with the fact that other studies show that homosexuals aren't any worse parents than heterosexuals, would explain the results. I tend to agree with this interpretation.