Friday, June 11, 2010

There's a Reason You're Not Getting Laid

I would hope by now you have heard about the study that showed that children of two lesbian parents do better* than even the children of two hetero parents. There's been a lot said about the study on both sides, but what I'm interested in is complete misogynistic asshat's people's reactions to this study. They are both enraging and amusing and not entirely unexpected.

Having two moms has to help with the nurturing

OTOH, having two moms might make you way more neurotic. I call that even.

Da wimminz iz teh crazee! Ah yes, only women are capable of nurturing a child, but watch out! women are also inherently crazy, and will pass that crazy onto their children unless there is a strong (cold) male presence to prevent it!


it's hard to see how being raised by two people neither or whom likes males

could do much for the confidence of male children (although many, if not most, male children of heterosexual couples might be in more or less the same position).

Lezzeez hate teh menz! Look, that's just ridiculous. There are any number of people I like and don't want to fuck, including my niece, my niceboss and my dog. You can't conflate sexual desire with fond feelings, other wise I'm going to assume that you really want to lay one on your grandma.


Lesbians, as a rule, don't "not like" males. They just don't like f@cking them. Not the same!


Thank you. and the reply:


Actually it is, if you are male, or it might as well be.


well, if you view women as nothing more than walking vaginas, cruelly not fulfilling your constant desire to stick your dick somewhere, sure, I bet there are lots of lesbians in your world. like 90% of the female population. here's a clue, buddy: even if I all want is a quick fuck, I don't want it from someone who hates women. lesbians are not your problem.

to even ask this question

is intensely cruel, anti-father and anti-male.

it is like asking: Do we NEED mothers? Guess WHAT! Kids are better off without MOMS!

but what do you care about being decent to men? you're a feminist.

To even ask what happens to real people existing in the real world is intensely cruel? well then, i suppose even thinking of doing studies on healthy people is intensely cruel to the disabled. asshat.


since, to a woman, everything about a man affects her desire for a man

by DEFINITION a lesbian hates men.

no, by definition, everything about a woman affects a lesbian's desires for other women. duh. i guess it sucks to have your oh-so-important penis rendered irrelevant.


if what this is supposed to imply is true

men are actively bad for a child.
Down with fathers!

yeesh. calm down, asshat, we're not bringing out the firing squads yet.


it is reports like this

that make me believe I need to side with the right and to fight the left.

any political persuasion that wants to eradicate one half of the human race is by definition evil.

dude, i'm a lefty and i like to fuck men. oh, yes, i do. *pauses for x-rated reverie* look, i'm sorry reality has a liberal bias, but "lesbians do a good job raising children" is not the same as "death to the penised ones!"


you want to diminish the vital role of men in childrens' lives. I do not know how I can make this clearer.

this sort of anti-male propaganda can no longer stand, not if you expect to hold any morally superior position. Children need biologically MALE fathers in their lives. Otherwise this is tantamount to CHILD ABUSE.

Do not tell me otherwise. To try to legitimize perversions such as this only makes the situation more untenable.

I particularly feel bad about the male children and how brainwashed they will be with so many witches around them. I speak from firsthand experience having grown up in a similar situation and being emotionally scarred for life as a result.

I see the same with some kids today and I wince when I see it.


therapy: you needs it

As a man with a functioning penis and potent sperm

I can honestly say that I don't feel threatened by the study indicating that the children of lesbian mothers are more well behaved than the children of straight couples.

I know there are a lot of women who want my penis and my sperm.

And I know in the future women will want my son's penis and sperm, assuming they are as good as his dad's.

What I do find threatening is the actions of conservatives to try to limit the freedoms and rights of homosexuals.

If lesbians want to raise children, then why should we do anything other than help them out?

I want this man to have his user name tattooed onto his forehead so i can run the other way if i see him.

men may not be eliminated in a physical sense

but the question is, if women can have kids and raise them without men, are they willing to deal with men who aren't either so totally compliant or so abnormally attractive that most men will be, socially, in effect, non existent.

again, the lesbians aren't your problem. if every woman who meets you tries to stab you with a fork, the problem is you.

How does the overwhelming percentage of people in prison that come from families with no father figure in the home affect this obviously biased theory?

On the small scale study in my family my two kids (boy and girl twins by the way) are far and away more mentally healthy than my lesbian sisters daughter. So I say in my experience straight couples have a two to one advantage.

correlation =/= causation fail. a) two families does not a trend make. b) a single parent home is not the same as a two parent home, no matter who the parents are. c) "i hate gays and i think my gay sister's kid is fucked up" is not actually a scientific study.



*It's been suggested that (a) these were planned pregnancies, (b) there were no unplanned siblings, and (c) any lesbian getting artificially inseminated 25 years ago would have been educated, well off and quite strong, all of which, when combined with the fact that other studies show that homosexuals aren't any worse parents than heterosexuals, would explain the results. I tend to agree with this interpretation.


8 comments:

  1. There's really only one thing we can possible say here:

    If we connect the dots here, the inescapable conclusion is that gay sex is a form of domestic terrorism.

    I think that quote officially justifies the existence of the internet in my mind...

    Da wimminz iz teh crazee!

    To be fair, I've done a highly non-scientific study of the women I've dated, the ones who seem to want to date me, and several of the women in my family and come to the conclusion that there is a high correlation between women and crazy. Of course, like any good believer in the scientific method, I continue searching for additional data points to either support my conclusion or show me that my statistical sampling has been off.

    It's been suggested that (a) these were planned pregnancies, (b) there were no unplanned siblings, and (c) any lesbian getting artificially inseminated 25 years ago would have been educated, well off and quite strong, all of which, when combined with the fact that other studies show that homosexuals aren't any worse parents than heterosexuals, would explain the results. I tend to agree with this interpretation.

    This. When you consider that it's rather easy for, say, a seventeen year old girl who got abstinence-only sex ed in Tubthump, Tennessee to get accidentally impregnated by her boyfriend in a fit of being a real human being while it's rather difficult for a woman to accidentally impregnate another woman, I'd say there's an exceptionally strong sampling bias here. It's basically impossible for there to not be a strong sampling bias.

    And, hell, there's that case of the lesbian couple that had the kid and the one woman got all born again and has kidnapped the kid to save him from teh gai and possibly skipped the country. I'd say that's not good parenting.

    I'd also say that it's not the lesbianism that caused it...

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I dunno, maybe I misread his point, but the guy with the FPaPS actually seemed to be making a fairly valid point: even if this were universally true, rather than the result of sampling bias, so what?

    I mean, I don't find the results threatening, either personally or sociologically. I don't see how that study would endanger society, children, or traditional marriage. A lot of these responses seem to say more about the people responding than the results of the survey... and if that's the point that FPaPS was making, I'm inclined to agree.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I find it fascinating that people are so threatened by the study.

    I live in a state that legally prevents gays from adopting. There are cases in the state Supreme Court currently with DCF trying to contest adoptions that have been allowed at the Circuit Court level. There are so many children out there that need good parents. I look at that study and feel relief at the thought that there might be actual evidence that another pool of capable parents is available. Rather than being threatened, or feeling that it says anything about my ability to parent with my husband, I'm happy at the thought that there is every reason to hope that we are one step closer to having more parents for all the children who need them in my state.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I always find it egocentric when men think that being a lesbian means that we hate men. Maybe it's not about men at all.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I always find it egocentric when men think that being a lesbian means that we hate men. Maybe it's not about men at all.

    But...but...EVERYTHING is about men. And, more specifically, everything is about me. If you're not having sex with men, then that means you're not having sex with me. And if every woman decides not to have sex with me, then it must be because all women are man-hating lezbos.

    Furthermore, the fact that I'm not CEO of my company is the fault of all them uppity women getting in to management positions. And if I lose my job tomorrow I'm reasonably certain it will be because of all the damn immigrants sneaking over the borders and taking all the good corporate drone positions with 401(k)s and full benefits packages. Also, I'm getting taxed so poor people can buy Lexuses with food stamps.

    Did I get all of that right?

    Although, on a completely different note, I think I have a spectacularly bizarre attitude for a modern American. The best way I can describe it is like this:

    Say I am in a room with a whole bunch of people and all of them know me. I make the assumption that if I walk out of said room absolutely no one in that room will remember I exist in the next moment and will go on about their lives as if they'd never met me.

    Now, this probably sounds like it's too far in the other direction, and I objectively know that people don't forget I exist. But, still, the point is that I operate my entire life as if no one else considers me to be an important, central figure in theirs. That seems to be a reasonably healthy attitude to me...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I bet it's from being raised by two liberal parents.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are for you guys, not for me. Say what you will. Don't feel compelled to stay on topic, I enjoy it when comments enter Tangentville or veer off into Non Sequitur Town. Just keep it polite, okay?

I am attempting to use blogger's new comment spam feature. If you don't immediately see your comment, it is being held in spam, I will get it out next time I check the filter. Unless you are Dennis Markuze, in which case you're never seeing your comment.

Creative Commons License
Forever in Hell by Personal Failure is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at foreverinhell.blogspot.com.