Massage, good times, Travel, escort for days, nights and weekends, My name's Geo. 20 year old, 5'9'', 130 pounds, 28'' waist size,8x6" UNCUT, VERSATILE, NICE ASS. Puerto Rican, fair/light-Skin, blond hair, blue eyes and athletic/muscular built. I'm a college guy, masculine, educated, really easy-going, great to get along with, can hold a conversation and passionate You could just say I love to have a good time. Very clean, professional, HIV and Disease FREE. For a sensual meet or companionship. Will do anything you say as long as you ask ;D Repeat encounters are always more exciting for me and make it more casual and comfortable for you as well. Call or text anytime.
Oooh, he's educated, passionate and . . . UNCUT. And a college guy. Who knew "attending college" was as important a qualification for gay hookers as it is for female strippers*? You do learn something new every day, I guess.
Geo's vital stats:
Weight: 132lbs (60kg), Height: 5' 9" (175cm), Body Hair:Smooth, Build: Lean/Swimmer, Eye Color: Blue, Hair Color: Blonde, Foreskin: Uncut, Cock Size: Large, Safe Sex: Always Safe, Sexual Position: Versatile, Sexual Orientation: Bisexual,Drugs: Non-Drug User, Smoking: Non-Smoker, Ethnicity: Latino, Languages Spoken: English, Spanish, Tastes / Specialties / Fetishes: Vanilla, Leather, Anal, Oral, Shaving, Spanking, Role Playing, Kissing, Toys, Feet, Talents: Modeling, Go-Go Dancing, Stripping, Massage, Travel Companion, Tour Guide, Interpreter.
I like a list that starts with "vanilla", moves on to "anal, oral, shaving, spanking" and ends in "feet". Geo's a well-rounded guy. Whose talents include Go-Go dancing, stripping, and interpreting. I think I'm starting to understand the problem with the UN.
*They are not paying for college, and no, she's not into you. You are giving her money.
Uncut is ALWAYS better. It’s just cuter.
ReplyDelete… What?
Are you 18 yet? (and for the love of science, do NOT do a google search on that!)
ReplyDeleteAww, c’mon. I was just “attacked” by Voxie Day followers for being “only 18”, so yes, I am.
ReplyDeleteAnd, Google search? Please, you’re looking at a guy who probably spends more time browsing online smut than is deemed reasonable.
(And I haz no shame in admitting it!)
Well, I wouldn't want to contribute to the delinquency of a minor, and . . . um, I'm guessing that your interest in smut extends to what the ladies are sporting, not the male equipment. So to speak.
ReplyDeleteA minor? I haven’t been one of ’em little ’uns since late December!
ReplyDeleteAs for my taste in smut … uh, yeah. Of course. Affirmative. Sure.
… Did I alienate every other commenter or something? Please don’t smite me.
it's cinco de mayo! they're partying!
ReplyDeletein certain circles, uncircumcised is quite the thing. i'm not sure why.
it does look different, but i don't recall that it feels any different . . .
It’s slightly amusing to mention circumcision when I just watched the Bullshit! episode on the very topic. But the answer for why so many do it is rather simple: in light of the complete lack of any medical reason to perform such a mutilation, the only reason left is conformity. That is, until others stop chopping off part of their babies’ genitals, too.
ReplyDeleteAnd, I wouldn’t know from experience (sadly), but I reckon uncut feels better during sex for both parties – the foreskin leaves the male’s genitals more pleasure-sensitive, and the “ribbing” when folded back during penetration (yup, the exact same feel they try to imitate with condoms and dildos …) is conversely more pleasurable for the receiver.
… Okay, all this sex talk is definitely gonna alienate everyone else. Oh, bugger.
The only thing I know about circumcision (which really is a form of genital mutilation) is that my sister went to school with a boy whose foreskin got infected at age 14, and then he had to have a circumcision done because the antibiotics didn't work . . . poor kid didn't walk right for a month.
ReplyDeleteI know circumcision rates in the US have gone down significantly since the recession started, so I'm not sure exactly how tied to the idea people are anymore. Maybe it will eventually fade away in populations that don't do it for religious reasons.
Of course, then CUT will be the turnon.
Interesting study I read once: when asked their least favorite color of lingerie on women, men overwhelmingly chose turquoise. Most favorite was a tie between red and black. However, when showed 20 pictures in a row of women in black or red lingerie, and then a picture of a woman in turquoise lingerie, the men overwhelmingly chose the turquoise as their favorite.
The moral of the story is, turnons require an element of "now that's something you don't see every day!". It doesn't really matter what it is.
I'm inalienable. Not that I have any idea what you're talking about.
ReplyDeleteYay! Now we have a party!
ReplyDeleteCounterpoint: the last I checked, there is some evidence that being circumcized reduces your chances of catching certain STDs. (Offhand, I don't recall which ones.) But that was the big factor in our decision relative to our two boys.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I'm pretty sure that most of the world isn't, y'know, doing research on the topic, so conformity is probably a better explanation for why it remains popular.
In other news, I'm starting a new organization to uphold the rights of individuals with unwanted heterosexual attraction to receive effective psychological care. Please donate money.
@Michael Mock:
ReplyDeleteActually, those studies saying that circumcision did help prevent diseases and stuff were found to be both very few and generally full of crap, IIRC. Comparing rates and statistics of infections and other illnesses between cut and uncut males, researchers found just about no statistical differences outside of a margin of error.
In other words, the idea that cutting prevents diseases is bunk. =P Besides, I much prefer my own uncut self. (Hell, the Bullshit! episode even showed how to grow the foreskin back after circumcision non-surgically. Pretty neat, and looks perfectly normal, too.)
Joe- wait, what happened with you and Vox Day? Do tell!!! He's one of my "favorites"!
ReplyDeleteAnyway... color me unsurprised about this latest homophobe/closet case.
"I like a list that starts with 'vanilla', moves on to 'anal, oral, shaving, spanking' and ends in 'feet'. Geo's a well-rounded guy."
LOL, I was thinking that too.
@Fannie:
ReplyDeleteLong story short, he went on again about how all women, even the strongest of feminists, really just want to submit to stronger men (which, evidently, is Voxspeak for “dominating assholes”) who can control their bitchy moods and etc., and even finished by saying that women who want to teach men to be more understanding about what women want in their male partners ought to be beaten (or something to that effect). (My post on the subject, here.)
In short: same ol’, same ol’.
A commenter of his then linked to my post in his comments and there were a few derisory mentions of my post – nothing more than name-calling, naturally – and some came and commented on mine. T’was fun. Kinda.
So, in other words, some of them ventured away from Vox's homosocial bathhouse of a blog to mansplain what women really want in a man?
ReplyDeleteLOL.
It's funny when asshole misogynists have convinced themselves that they are Experts On Women. Their opinions are basically just their own fantasies of womanly submission and inferiority.
Being traditionalist Christians who’ve been burned by the gender they love oppressing so much tends to do that. Amongst other things.
ReplyDelete… Okay, all this sex talk is definitely gonna alienate everyone else. Oh, bugger.
ReplyDeleteReplace "alienate" with "amuse" and you're correct. I just had absolutely nothing to add to the conversation.
One of the real problems with the circumcised v. uncircumcised debate re: pleasure for the giver, though, is that it's really hard to figure out a way to scientifically test it. I mean, there's a conceivable way to test it, but I don't see a lot of guys volunteering to participate in that study. So you've got guys who have always been circumcised or guys who have never been circumcised, while pain and pleasure are subjective concepts, so we'll probably never actually know.
« Replace "alienate" with "amuse" and you're correct. »
ReplyDeleteOh, right, I’d forgotten this was one of ’em atheist blogs. Smexy stuff is practically a requirement on those. (Hehe.)
Us dear sex-crazed atheists. We r0ck.
Us dear sex-crazed atheists. We rock.
ReplyDeleteIt's not that we're more sex-crazed. It's that we're allowed to admit it...
re: circumcision [male, standard US-ian type]
ReplyDeletewhen my stupid youngest sister had her boy, we ALL tried and tried and TRIED to convince her to NOT have him circumcised. and i think we would have won [bcuz the nurses and docs were on our side] except my blondest-sister is LAZY. and hearing about all the "work" required to make sure his penis and foreskin are clean and don't get infected...
she freaked.
originally, circumcision [outside of religious circles] became BIG *for* sanitary reasons. yeast infections and UTIs have been "female complaints" ever since circumcision became popular [BEFORE then, yeast infections and UTIs were slightly MORE common in men]
At the risk of being a little too graphic, as an uncut male I can tell you that for my 24+ years of existence I've had to do very little (if nothing) extra, depending on cleaning regimen and have had literally ZERO problems downstairs.
ReplyDeleteI have no idea where the myth came from that getting chopped made things easier...
Well, I am an uncut male of 55 and I have never had a problem.
ReplyDeleteAnd when my son was born, we opted not to have him cut. We had to argue with doctors and nurses who insisted he would always have infections.
He hasn't yet and he is now 18.