Monday, June 1, 2009

Children: The Harbingers of Immorality

gay, marriage, prop 8, same sex, children, divorce, premarital, adultery, ivf, immoral, immorality
or "Asking the Obvious Question"

The Playful Walrus is determined to ask the obvious question when it comes to other people's private lives:

WHERE IS THE MOTHER? We know these two guys did not conceive and carry these children. If they rescued these kids from a group home, that's a different matter than breaking up a marriage, making babies out of wedlock, or intentionally depriving these children of a mother. Since the media loves focusing on couples with kids in these stories, I will keep asking the obvious question every time they fail to answer it.

Now, you might say Walrus is combining bigotry with an unseemly interest in other people's private lives, but I say why stop at gay couples' children? Children potentially represent all kinds of immorality: divorce, premarital sex, adultery, IVF (but what about the zygotes!), the list goes on.

So I say don't just ask gay couples where the mother/father is, ask that question of any child you see on the street with only one adult accompanying them. Sure, daddy or mommy might be at work, or simply might have stayed at home, but surely we all have the right to make sure we're not witnessing the results of a divorce, or even worse, a couple who never did get married. Of course, it's entirely possible you may confront a recent widow/widower, but don't let that stop you.

But why stop there?

What about divorce, or what about all those women who just can't help but spreading their legs for every guy who comes along, and then pass off their children as their spouse's, another favorite topic of the Walrus? Those children represent immorality so any time you see a child that does not resemble the man (s)he is with, you should inquire as to the paternity. In fact, you may just want to go ahead and take a DNA sample, just to be sure. Don't let a little thing like an assault charge stop you.

What about the use of IVF? They don't just fertilize one egg, you know. And they don't store the rest of the frozen darlings forever, either. So, if you see a family composed of what looks suspiciously like multiples, you should ask how they were conceived. Don't let anyone tell you it's not your business, it totally is.

What about those childless couples you see? Well, they're just selfish and paving the way for the muslim takeover of the world. So the next time you see a man and a woman out in public without children, you should make sure they're taking their reproductive responsibilities seriously. Sure, their children could be at home, and you run the risk of asking that question of someone whose child just died, but don't let that stop you in your quest to save the world's children.

What about older couples with young children? You know that's some kind of immorality. Sure, it could just be grandma and grandpa taking their grandchildren out for some fun, but it could be the horror of older people having babies, or grandparents forced to raise their grandchildren due to their children's uncontrollable immorality, which is always the parents' fault, anyway.

Frankly, I think Playful Walrus hasn't gone far enough. Though, if you're going to root out all the immorality those little things some people call the future represent, Walrus is spot on: you shouldn't let a little thing like common decency get in your way.


  1. The Walrus asks this question a lot. When it comes to same-sex couples, this "Christian" loses all elements of basic decency.

    That's why I think the answer is simple:

    "None of your fucking business."

    That may be harsh, but you bring up a good point PF. Walrus would never ask this question of other non-nuclear family forms (although he would probably still disapprove of them). It's that authoritarian attitude that all kids need a mommy and a daddy just because Walrus thinks all kids need a mommy and a daddy and, therefore, he'll be an ass to any families that don't meet that model that's really harmful.

  2. i tried to read the comments over there so i could join the coversation...

    but i am too enraged to read any more. apparantly according to Walrus' echo chamber, having an egg donor and surrogate mother is EXACTLY THE SAME and buy slaves for a rich Virginia plantation. that a woman having a child in such a manner, for a gay couple, is evil and immoral and is exactly the same as slavery; that wanting a child enough to have a surrogate mother means that you don't want to raise a child, but want to OWN a child.
    and etc.

    and... bulbshitbullshitBULLSHIT. i know dozens of people personally who treat their kids as accessories, who only have kids because it's expected and who force those kids to be "mini-me's" - but so long as it's a heterosexual marriage, the people at Walrus' place think that THOSE owned children are in a GREAT position, but a loving kind pair great parents who happen to be two gay men? are only BUYING AND TRADING CHILDREN AS POSSESSIONS.

    just... ::rage::


Comments are for you guys, not for me. Say what you will. Don't feel compelled to stay on topic, I enjoy it when comments enter Tangentville or veer off into Non Sequitur Town. Just keep it polite, okay?

I am attempting to use blogger's new comment spam feature. If you don't immediately see your comment, it is being held in spam, I will get it out next time I check the filter. Unless you are Dennis Markuze, in which case you're never seeing your comment.

Creative Commons License
Forever in Hell by Personal Failure is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at