Friday, April 16, 2010

No Judges at All . . . Until the Android Army Arrives

I would like to say that I welcome our eventual Android Overlords and their relentlessly logical rule, even if it does do unfortunate things to reality television. No wait, especially if it does unfortunate things to reality television.

We're going to need those androids if Bryan Fischer, of the American Family Association, has his way.

"[A] gay judge's sexual preference will, without any question whatsoever, 'interfere with their job.' It's not possible for it to be otherwise... We simply should not elevate to the highest court in the land people who are known for engaging in sexually abnormal behavior which would technically make them felons in a quarter of the states over which they will have jurisdiction." -- Bryan Fischer, American Family Association


Well, Bryan, by your logic, absolutely no one is qualified to be a judge. If a homosexual's orientation will interfere with their job, I fail to see how a heterosexual's orientation will not interfere with their job, so we're going to need someone is neither gay, nor straight, and certainly not bisexual, being both, so . . . android.

As for homosexuals being felons in a quarter of the states, have you seen the laws still on the books in these states? Most heterosexual acts are illegal, too. Ever had oral sex? You're a felon. Anal sex? Go straight to jail. Male trucker having sex with a female toll collector in the toll booth? In Pennsylvania that's illegal. (Female truckers are free to have sex with male toll collectors in the toll booth, and anyone can have sex with anyone driving a vehicle other than a truck in the toll booth.) Sex with a porcupine? In Florida, that's forbidden. (Of all the laws you'd think you wouldn't have to pass . . .) Seriously, sexual laws in the US are hilarious- and cover pretty much anything you'd want to do, and a great many things I can't believe anyone ever did or thought about doing.

I think we need to go further, though. The word replace on the above quote can be used with any descriptive, really. For example:

[A] white/black/hispanic/pacific islander/native american/other judge's race will, without any question whatsoever, 'interfere with their job.' It's not possible for it to be otherwise...
So . . . androids, who don't have opinions so much as they have facts. Or possibly someone who is white and black and hispanic and pacific islander and native american and other simultaneously, because possibly holding all those backgrounds at once would even everything out. Or not.

[A] male/female/tall/short/abled/disabled/attractive/unattractive/thin/obese judge's life experiences will, without any question whatsoever, 'interfere with their job.' It's not possible for it to be otherwise...
So, we'll need someone who neither male nor female, neither tall nor short, neither able nor disabled, neither attractive nor unattractive, neither thin nor obese . . . this will either be the most nondescript hermaphrodite in all of history, or an android.

Hold up a flag for the Android Army, because we're going to need them.

5 comments:

  1. I can't believe I clicked over to his blog. I'm SOOOOO mad now!!!! What a homophobic prick.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sorry, I should include a warning about those links. Something like, "For Professionals Only, Hell Does Not Assume Responsibility for Untrained Clicking."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Atheists,

    but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH... therefore you FAIL...


    THE DEATH TRAP

    http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/FaceOff/
    ********

    THE REAL QUESTION:

    DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?

    AND THE ANSWER - NO!

    http://www.disclose.tv/forum/does-ath-ism-have-a-future-no-t19859.html




    Shermer - Harris - Myers - Dawkins - Randi VS. NOSTRADAMUS - EINSTEIN - MARKUZE


    you're ANNIHILATED!


    Atheists,

    Repent and turn to God.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Atheists,

    but you have NO ANSWER TO DEATH... therefore you FAIL..."

    Actually, it's worse than that. I wasn't even aware that death - excuse me, DEATH - was a question.

    "DOES ATHEISM HAVE A FUTURE?

    AND THE ANSWER - NO!"

    Really? Permit me to doubt you. If you believed that, you'd leave us to our foolishness; a view with no future requires no response from you.

    "Repent and turn to God."

    Tried that. He told me not to believe in Him.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are for you guys, not for me. Say what you will. Don't feel compelled to stay on topic, I enjoy it when comments enter Tangentville or veer off into Non Sequitur Town. Just keep it polite, okay?

I am attempting to use blogger's new comment spam feature. If you don't immediately see your comment, it is being held in spam, I will get it out next time I check the filter. Unless you are Dennis Markuze, in which case you're never seeing your comment.

Creative Commons License
Forever in Hell by Personal Failure is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at foreverinhell.blogspot.com.