"But PF," you say, "I'm not doing your job for you!"
"Hello, I don't paid for this . . . and, there's a video of a praying mantis eating another praying mantis post coitus as proof of something. Do you really want to miss that? Here, look at what you're missing:"
Absolutely,..and precisely because females are now able to and indeed seek to legislate and personify the male within government. I believe instinctually males tend to avoid competition and conflict with females and are actually quite responsive to female demands, screams and otherwise female demands or perceived need for more protection and provision. I do believe that males are predisposed to look after female general safety and well being. As you have noticed deference to females has become legislated by law. This is inevitably what happens to the political and social system when females are given power over it. They actually commandeer the social fabric and legislative policies to serve their own ends. Female authority and power is not protective or provisionary to males as male power and authority is to females.
It is no mistake that the Stimulus Package was devoted to females upon the request of Women's Party Feminists for protection and provision though 80% of all jobs lost have been to men.
There's words. They may or may not mean something. It's hard to say. When did we get a Women's Party, anyway? I have a friend registered to the Halloween Party, but I don't recall ever seeing the Women's Party.
Female authority is not protective or provisional like male authority is. When female gynocentrism becomes systemic as it has, civilizational decline quickly follows, historically it always has. I am not so sure our Republic can recover from this…. But we have the duty to understand what is happening in the hopes of correcting it….
Female power, being gynocentric in nature advocates for the consummation of resources around the well being of females and females alone. Women as a political group will not stop this, it is simply female nature. Systemically speaking female authority and power consumes the system of itself.
Nero, Caligula, Hitler, Stalin and, what, Margaret Thatcher? Is that his best example?
I dunno. 3:1 this dude hates his mother for reasons that would make an issue of Wiffle Ball Fuckers Anonymous seem normal. I don't want to know.
Y'know, I clicked the link and my brain just said, "Word soup. Ignore."
ReplyDeleteTHE BOOBQUAKE - 911!
ReplyDeletehey, atheists don't even BELIEVE IN BOOBIES!!!
they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!
see, I just want to make it clear to the rest of you:
jen is unable to see that there is a CONFLICT BETWEEN EROS & SCIENCE....
________________
http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/in-name-of-science-i-offer-my-boobs.html
ETA: follow-up
http://www.blaghag.com/2010/04/quick-clarification-about-boobquake.html
see how we take a term and convert it into its AUTHENTIC POLITICAL DIMENSION - THAT
OF LIBERATION - not just merely harmless expression...
they thought BOOBIES had no effect... WRONG!
____________
the really SHARP END OF OCCAM’S RAZOR…
they mix SKEPTICISM with ATHEISM…
KABOOM…
Now I want you to listen to this little f*cker...
http://www.ted.com/talks/james_randi.html
Randi:
When I see your UGLY FACE I understand why you are an atheist
_________________________________
Visit for the BOOBQUAKE
http://www.freethought-forum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=22932
Okay, that was funny. "They thought boobies had no effect - WRONG!"
ReplyDeleteCan't you just see that on a movie poster?
well... at least we know DM didn't kill himself...
ReplyDeletePF: i'm sorry, i TRIED to read that blog, but - i just COULD NOT. when your fallopian tubes crawl out your vagina and start throttling you, it's a SIGN FROM GOD [or, at least, your comparatively-sane girly bits] that what you're trying to read is BEYOND WRONG
DM- you might consider posting over at Rebuking Feminism, the site PF is talking about here. You and he seem to be on the same wavelength about the evil power women wield: they bite men's heads off, and cause earthquakes with their boobs. Perhaps the two of you together can convince the world. Just a suggestion.
ReplyDelete